She said the school would offer refunds to those who wanted one, and that the district is “receiving feedback from parents/guardians/students on making this process better for next year.”įeedback isn't what this school needs.
#Yearbook photos girls were altered hide code#
“Bartram Trail High School’s previous procedure was to not include student pictures in the yearbook that they deemed in violation of the student code of conduct, so the digital alterations were a solution to make sure all students were included in the yearbook,” Langston told The Record. These students were permitted to wear these outfits throughout the day without reprimand, but later were made to look clownish. Augustine Record that a teacher who also serves as the yearbook coordinator made the edits after deciding some of the photos violated dress code. It is objectifying and sexualizing them.Ĭhristina Langston, a school district spokeswoman, told The St. It is teaching them that their bodies are somehow inappropriate. Of course.Īnd forcing them to hide their bodies, particularly developing bodies, sends them a message that they should be ashamed and embarrassed of their anatomy. There are group photos in the yearbook that include the boys' swim team wearing nothing but bandage-sized briefs. O’Keefe started an online petition to change the dress code, which already has nearly 6,000 signatures.A bit of background: Bartram has been under fire for the disparate way dress code policies have been enforced between boys and girls, and for excluding gender non-conforming and transgender students. This latest move is so out of bounds, so punitive, it's almost laughable. None of these boys were disciplined.Īfter this incident, Ms. The next day, boys protested alongside the girls by wearing dresses and skirts.
#Yearbook photos girls were altered hide zip#
One male teacher called out a girl who wore a zip up sweater over a bra and was ordered to remove the jacket and wear the shirt that the school officials gave her, says Ms. Spokesperson Langston says the school was offering refunds and they were “receiving feedback from parents, guardians, and students on making this process better for next year.”īack in March, administrators stood in the hallways to call out girls or take them out of class for violating the dress code. She told The Record that Bartram Trail High School’s previous procedure was to not include students’ pictures in the yearbook that were “deemed in violation of the student code of conduct.” The digital alterations were “a solution” to make sure “all students were included in the yearbook.”
Augustine Record that the teacher serving as the yearbook coordinator had made the edits. “They’re all good students, and we’re going to focus on whether you have too much shoulder showing? It’s out of control,” Ms O’Keefe said.ĭistrict spokesperson Christina Langston told The St. Johns County School District Student Code of Conduct or may be digitally adjusted.”Īccording to The New York Times, shirts must be “modest and not revealing or distracting.” He continued saying that there was no intent to “embarrass or shame any student for the clothes that they wear.” However, the public high school website defends the edits saying that the yearbook photos “must be consistent with the St. The superintendent replied saying there wasn’t a “sufficient review of the steps taken before the decision was made to edit some student pictures.” On Saturday, numerous parents and students demanded an apology.
O’Keefe and said that the alterations made them feel “sexualized and exposed.” According to The New York Times, the altered photos were part of a “series of crackdowns” used by the administration in an attempt to “police” what girls wear. Some of them were labeled as “clumsy alterations.” Before and After photos. O’Keefe went through the pages she discovered dozens of other female–and only female–students’ photos had been altered to cover up their chests. She told The New York Times that a “black bar had been placed to cover her daughter’s chest.” When her mother finally got a copy, she opened the page to her daughter’s photo to find that her image had indeed been altered. That day, there were rumors going around the school that photos had been altered, said freshman Riley O’Keefe. The school superintendent explains there was “no intent to embarrass or shame them” for the “clothes they wore,” according to The New York Times. Johns County, Florida, photos of at least 80 female students had been digitally edited to hide their chests.
0 kommentar(er)
